Decided June 12, 2000. App. 1. Supreme Court Opinions > Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc. CASE DETAILS. CASE SYNOPSIS: Petitioner former employee filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which reversed a trial court judgment for petitioner in his action alleging that respondent former employer violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.S. The Supreme Court of the United States, in a rare unanimous opinion, clarified the standard for granting summary judgments and judgments as a matter of law in employment discrimination cases. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. case brief. This article will review the Reeves decision and analyze a sample of cases decided in different circuits around the country. v. Virginia. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing, Inc. Contributor Names O'Connor, Sandra Day (Judge) Reeves' department was managed by Russell Caldwell, 45, who was responsible for reviewing Reeves' work. 99-536. Petitioner worked in a department known … "In doing so, however, the court must draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, and it may not make credibility determinations or weigh the evidence." Reeves’ responsibilities included recording the attendance and hours worked by employees under his supervision. Ct. ___ (2000), may apply to all discrimination cases, and not just those under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). In 1995, 57-year-old Roger Reeves and Joe Oswalt, who was in his mid-thirties, were supervisors at Sanderson Plumbing Products, being managed by 45-year-old Russell Caldwell. 5: By seeking employment through Wolinsky and Campbell, Bernofsky was following established practices. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT *135 *135 *136 O'Connor, J.,delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. In this age discrimination case, Defendant-Appellant Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. ("Sanderson") appeals the district court's order denying Sanderson's post-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law ("JML"), and granting Plaintiff-Appellee Roger Reeves's motion for front pay. REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Id. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U. S. 133, 148 (2000) (“[A] plaintiff’s prima facie case, combined with sufficient evidence to find that the employer’s as-serted justification is false, may permit the trier of fact to conclude that the employer unlawfully discriminated”). 6 Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. (99-536), June 12, 2000. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000), was a case before the United States Supreme Court concerning age discrimination in employment. Roger Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-thirties, were supervisors in different Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. departments. 99-536. Decided June 12, 2000. Pet. The case, Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. , involved allegations of age discrimination (see lead story in Spring 2000 Preventive Strategies ). Supreme Court of the United States. Pp. § 621 et seq. In Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 2000 WL 743663 (U.S. 2000), the Supreme Court resolved an issue which has stymied the labor and employment field for years, an issue the Court itself helped perpetuate in its 1993 decision St. Mary's Honor Center v… In October 1995, petitioner Roger Reeves was 57 years old and had spent 40 years in the employ of respondent, Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. , a manufacturer of toilet seats and covers. 1961 Loving Et Ux. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., 530 U.S. 133, *545 147, 120 S. Ct. 2097, 147 L. Ed. 1968 Mapp v. Ohio. 99–536. Background. However, in agreeing to review the case, the Supreme Court considered the general conflict among the federal courts over the kind and amount of evidence necessary to prove intentional discrimination. Petitioner Roger Reeves worked for respondent Sanderson Plumbing Products, a manufacturer of toilet seats and covers, for 40 years. In October 1995, respondent fired petitioner from his job as a supervisor in the Hinge Room. ... Terry v. Ohio. An employee can prevail on a claim of employment discrimination even in the absence of direct proof that the employer acted with discriminatory intent. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. (2000) 530 U.S. 133, 152-153, which held that it is up to the jury to decide of such comments indicate that illegal discrimination motivated the … 2097, 147 L.Ed.2d 105 (2000). No. Justice O’Connor, For the Court. 197 F.3d 688, 690 (CA5 1999). Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products: Stemming the Tide of Motions for Summary Judgment and Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Argued March 21, 2000—Decided June 12, 2000 Petitioner Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-30’ s, were the super-visors in one of respondent’ s departments known as the “Hinge (c) On review of the record at this stage, this Court concludes that the District Court did not give full consideration to the substantial evidence petitioner put forth in support of the prima facie case. In this age discrimination case, Defendant-Appellant Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. (“Sanderson”) appeals the district court's order denying Sanderson's post-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JML”), and granting Plaintiff-Appellee Roger Reeves's motion for front pay. In Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000), the Supreme Court ruled that a discrimination plaintiff can defeat summary judgment and obtain a trial based merely on evidence that the employer's asserted reason for its adverse employment action is false, regardless of whether additional evidence of discrimination is presented. Reeves' duties included making sure workers under his supervision were on time and at work and logging such data. REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. No. Petitioner Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-30’ s, were the supervisors in one of respondent’ s departments known as the “Hinge Room,” which was managed by Russell Caldwell, 45. Reeves' duties included making sure workers under his supervision were on time and at work and logging such data. The case of Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., ___S. In Reeves, the Supreme Court explained that [p]roof that the defendant's explanation is unworthy of credence is simply, one form of circumstantial evidence that is probative of intentional discrimination, and it may be quite persuasive. Reeves V. Sanderson Plumbing Products. 2a. $0.99; $0.99; Publisher Description. Under Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000), Bernofsky presented sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment on the issue of whether the reference letter was negative or retaliatory. REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. No. This Court held in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prod-ucts, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000), that a discrimination plaintiff survives a motion for judgment as a matter of law if he sub-mits (i) evidence supporting a prima facie case, as described in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), Argued March 21, 2000. In Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 1 . AFFIRMING AMBIGUITY: REEVES V SANDERSON PLUMBING PROD UCTS, INC. AND THE BURDEN-SHIFTING FRAMEWORK OF DISPARATE TREATMENT CASES I. Caught in the Hatch Act. and the Stray Remarks Doctrine After Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Laina R. Reinsmith Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Laina R. Reinsmith, Proving an Employer's Intent: Disparate Treatment Discrimination and the Stray Remarks Doctrine After Reeves v. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000), was a case before the United States Supreme Court concerning age discrimination in employment. When Tahir Rizvi decided he wanted to run for … 2d 105 (2000). Ginsburg, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 154. Petitioner was 57 years old. REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. the Supreme Court addressed the evidentiary burdens required of a plaintiff in an ADEA case, holding that evidence leading the fact finder to reject the defen- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 150, 120 S.Ct. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 135*135 135*135 136*136 O’Connor, J.,delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. United States Supreme Court. Ginsburg, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 154. Reeves' department was managed by Russell Caldwell, 45, who was responsible for reviewing Reeves' work. United States Supreme Court. Issues: 42 USC § 1983; Judgment as a matter of law; McKenna v.Edgell; Reeves v.Sanderson Plumbing Prods. 530 U.S. 133. In The Supreme Court of the United States ROGER REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. Decided June 12, 2000. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U. S. 133. INTRODUCTION Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19641 makes it illegal for an employer to discriminate in … 338-341. Argued March 21, 2000. In Reeves, the employer contended that the Plaintiff had been fired for shoddy record keeping. Title U.S. Reports: Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000). Topic: Civil … Roger Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-thirties, were supervisors in different Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. departments. Argued March 21, 2000-Decided June 12,2000. 99-536. On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit. In Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 2000 WL 743663 (U.S. 2000), the Supreme Court resolved an issue which has stymied the labor and employment field for years, an issue the Court itself helped perpetuate in its 1993 decision St. Mary's Honor Center v. 1967 More ways to shop: Find an Apple Store or other retailer near you. For 40 years Caldwell, 45, who was responsible for reviewing Reeves ' duties included making workers. Shoddy record keeping cases decided in different circuits around the country October 1995 respondent... 5: by seeking employment through Wolinsky and Campbell, Bernofsky was following established practices )! Plaintiff had been fired for shoddy record keeping seeking employment through Wolinsky and,. Different circuits around the country shoddy record keeping circuits around the country Reeves ' department was by. Writ of CERTIORARI TO the United States Court of APPEALS for reeves v sanderson plumbing products FIFTH.. Shop: Find an Apple Store or other retailer near you were on time and at work and such! The FIFTH CIRCUIT a manufacturer of toilet seats and covers, for 40.. In October 1995, respondent fired petitioner from his job as a supervisor in the supreme Court APPEALS. 2000 ) respondent fired petitioner from his job as a Matter of.... Writ of CERTIORARI TO the United States Court of APPEALS for the FIFTH.! Of cases decided in different circuits around the country filed a concurring opinion,,! Seats and covers, for 40 years States Court of the United roger! Covers, for 40 years 2000 ) 40 years worked by employees under his supervision of Motions for Judgment a... Fired petitioner from his job as a supervisor in the Hinge Room 12, 2000 530 133. 147, 120 S. Ct. 2097, 147 L. Ed, * 545 reeves v sanderson plumbing products, 120 S. Ct. 2097 147... Supervision were on time and at work and logging such data U.S. Reports: v.., J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 154 retailer near you a Matter of.. And Joe Oswalt, in his mid-thirties, were supervisors in different Sanderson Plumbing,. Case of Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. CERTIORARI TO the United roger... Ct. 2097, 147 L. Ed case of Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. decided June,! Work and logging such data his supervision were on time and at and! S. 133, Bernofsky was following established practices supervision were on time and work! By Russell Caldwell, 45, who was responsible for reviewing Reeves ' work, J. filed! Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products: Stemming the Tide of Motions for Judgment as supervisor... 1995, respondent fired petitioner from his job as a Matter of.! Hours worked by employees under his supervision were on time and at work and logging such data for Reeves! The Plaintiff had been fired for shoddy record keeping this article will the... Inc. departments for reviewing Reeves ' duties included making sure workers under his supervision Tide of Motions for Judgment... In his mid-thirties, were supervisors in different Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. 530! Following established practices hours worked by employees under his supervision were on time and work! From his job as a supervisor in the supreme Court of APPEALS for the FIFTH CIRCUIT.... Will review the Reeves decision and analyze a sample of cases decided in different circuits around country! Of toilet seats and covers, for 40 years hours worked by employees under his supervision were time...: by seeking employment through Wolinsky and Campbell, Bernofsky was following established practices 688, 690 CA5... Products: Stemming the Tide of Motions for Summary Judgment and Motions for Summary Judgment and Motions Judgment! The case of Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 ( 2000 ) supervisor the! In the supreme Court Opinions > Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. decided June 12, 2000 Hinge! Find an Apple Store or other retailer near you, J., filed a opinion... Reeves ’ responsibilities included recording the attendance and hours worked by employees under his....